How does the MPC Touch compare to Maschine and Push?

Recently, there has been a lot of (sometimes heated) argument over whether or not AKAI’s new MPC Touch holds its own against the more established NI Maschine mkII and Ableton Push. As the UK’s favourite, friendly music store, we’ve got quite a bit of experience of using all three units and so are well placed to shed some light on the situation!


First off, let’s look at the similarities. All three are essentially advanced controllers for their host application. Disconnected from your computer, they turn into paperweights. It’s easy to look at the luscious, high-resolution displays on the Maschine and Touch and think that there’s more going on inside the actual box than just relaying data between the blinky lights at your fingertips and the computer, but there really isn’t. Unfortunately many people who are new to the technology are lulled into thinking this by fancy demos on YouTube.

Secondly, all three units are built to last. The Touch, Push 2, and Maschine have very high quality fittings: the knobs and wheels are robust; the performance pads are sensitive and feel like they’re good take a hundred years of finger-bashing; and the cases are all solid enough for life on tour.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

There’s not much point in going into the differences between the associated software for each of these units, as they all have their dedicated fans who can’t seem to live without them. Suffice to say that each unit comes with vast sample libraries with their own particular flavour, and all have unique workflow boons and quirks.

The MPC Touch is the only unit of the three to include audio interface functionality – in that once it’s connected to your computer, you can hook up your monitor speakers, headphones and line inputs directly to the Touch. The Push 2 and Maschine require a separate interface, and although that’s a great thing for people who already own a high quality audio interface, for those looking to take their first steps in producing music with a computer this is another sizeable expense to consider.

The other thing that differentiates the Touch from its rivals is that – and you could have guessed this one – it has a capacitive touch screen interface. Given the ubiquity of touch screens in modern tech, it’s surprising that so few affordable items in the audio tech world use them.

There are of course hundreds of other small control, performance, and superficial differences between the three units, but I think we can break it down quite simply…

  • If you already use Ableton, buy a Push. It will really, really enhance your workflow.
  • If you have experience with hardware samplers or MPCs, or are new to computer music making, buy an MPC Touch.
  • If you want an expansive library of sounds and an intuitive controller to integrate into your current DAW, buy a Maschine.

Do you own any of these awesome music makers? Leave a comment with your recommendations!

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


The following two tabs change content below.

Guy Perchard

Digital editor & recording specialist at Red Dog Music
As well as being the marketing man-about-town at Red Dog Music, Guy is a busy, award winning record producer and mixing engineer. He is also partial to a chorizo stromboli for elevenses.

5 Responses to “How does the MPC Touch compare to Maschine and Push?”

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Marc Us says:

    I hesitate between Maschine and MPC touch. I use Logic pro X and I want to edit samples. There is 2 Maschine (500 and 1000 $) and the MPC costs 700$. I never had pad for sampler or DAW controller. So can an I use the MPC touch to use my DAW? And what is the best between the both? My budget it around 500 to 1000$

    • Kevin says:

      I’m in the same boat Marc Us. What did you end up doing? Happy with your choice?

      I kind of want the option to get away from the computer as well. Does this effect decision making?

  2. Alex says:

    Just bought the mpc touch and tried to integrate it with my DAW (reason), it’s not a very effective workflow I have to save on mpc software them export and import as audio file edit then continue to the the workflow whole process slows down the creative juices I’m gonna go return it and get a milachine and let you know if it works better

  3. fantasticgoat says:

    Suppose i have an old simi slow 3GHZ computer. When i connect midi devices and punch drum pads theres a latency delay. Would relying on the $500 Akai touch eliminate this issue, because I could use it to record and sample from the unit, even though it’s connected via usb?

Leave a Reply to Alex Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.